…Woodward Late-evening Supercell…
(originally written August 20th for a storm chaser forum, slightly edited/uploaded to blog December 13th)
August 19th was a rather interesting day. After the tornado watch conference call with the Storm Prediction Center at work, shift was over and I left DDC at about 4:15pm and headed down to a clumping Cu field in Woods/Alfalfa county. When I first left, a nice hard tower was evident distant southeast and when I looked at radar and saw the blips wayyy the hell southeast close to Enid, I thought this was a fool’s errand. I got gas in Greensburg and contemplated heading home. I then noticed some agitated cumulus to my southwest. Observations showed southwest winds all around northwest OK… yet dewpoints were in the 65 to 67 degree range. Even with a southwest surface wind, there was still excellent deep layer shear across NW OK with the impinging upper jet streak from the northwest. It became clear as I was driving south toward Hwy 64 that the outflow boundary towers were just not doing it. I was rather surprised that I didn’t see atom-bomb city going on southeast. I wonder if there was a mesoscale gradient in convective inhibition (CINH) there that was just too much for the Enid towers as they were advected downstream to the east? Were these towers/plumes moving east or southeast? If they were moving due east, they would have crossed the boundary at a sharper angle and succumbed to the CINH faster… just not enough time to get that deep sustained moist convection process “jump started”.
These were the things that were actually running through my mind as I was watching this unfold from a distance to my southeast. Meanwhile, to my southwest, the boundary layer was deeper with lower 0-3km static stability and thus easier to “jump start” deep, moist convection. It’s all about initiation, and the direction of motion of towers once they initiate. Regarding that Enid area failed initiation, it just seemed to me that once plumes went up, they crossed the boundary and the strongly backed winds were doing a number on the “jump starting” process. Nice backed easterly winds are great once you have a well-established storm, obviously. What if the towers formed 20 miles farther west…such that they had more time to accumulate growth…before interacting with the higher CINH easterly flow east of the OFB? It could have been a much different story perhaps. I’m just thinking out loud here.
When I got to Hwy 64, I drove west and thought that I could get a good storm going around Harper-Ellis County, OK given the uniform lower static stability in the lower troposphere + CAPE still around 3000 J/kg. 800 to 1000 foot higher elevation also helps in this department for convective initiation… which is why I usually favor farther west for storm initiation. I’ve seen this song and dance before — fantastic looking soundings, good convergence, parcel theory suggesting CINH < 25 Joules… yet still nothing. In almost all these cases, there seems to be too sharp of a potential temperature gradient with initial storm motion vectors taking initial plumes into the cooler pot temps too quickly…and you just end up with anorexia.
Oh yeah, the northwest of Woodward storms were pretty photogenic. Saw a wall cloud at sunset northwest of Woodward, some incredible crepuscular rays radiating through a storm tower (the soon to be Woodward supercell)… there were actually two side-by-side initially. The images below show the initial towering cumulus stage with the northeastern storm developing a nice structure toward sunset. The western storm was the one that eventually took over to the northwest of Woodward, which is what the wall cloud images are from.
This SimpleViewer gallery requires Macromedia Flash. Please open this post in your browser or get Macromedia Flash
here.
This is a
WPSimpleViewerGallery